Discussion:
A group of 17 European countries call for a 'paradigm shift' to deport rejected "asylum seekers"
(too old to reply)
Lucas McCain
2024-10-13 17:48:03 UTC
Permalink
Why do Europeans show such weakness and helplessness in the face of mass
invasion from hostile nations? Does anti-Christ George Soros run the
European Parliament and have puppets in every capitol? Why not fly
these failed "asylum seekers" over their countries of origin and force
them out of the planes with parachutes until they are all gone from Europe?

https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2024/10/07/17-european-countries-call-for-a-paradigm-shift-to-deport-rejected-asylum-seekers

The European Union has struggled to improve the deportation rate of
asylum seekers whose applications have been turned down.

A group of 17 European countries has called for a "paradigm shift" in
migration policy to ensure asylum seekers whose applications have been
declined are effectively and speedily sent back to their home countries.

This new approach, they say, should entail "consequences" for those who
are handed a return order but never leave the continent.

"People without the right to stay must be held accountable. A new legal
basis must clearly define their obligations and duties," the countries
write in a non-paper seen by Euronews. "Non-cooperation must have
consequences and be sanctioned."

Governments, they continue, "must be empowered" to carry out
deportations "in full respect of fundamental rights".

The document was led by Austria and the Netherlands and endorsed by
Croatia, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece,
Italy, Luxembourg, Malta, Slovakia and Sweden. Norway, Switzerland and
Liechtenstein, three non-EU member states part of the Schengen Area,
also lent their signatures.

The group asks the European Commission to treat the matter
"expeditiously" and put forward a "state-of-the-art framework that
responds to real challenges and developments," building upon the
discussions of a working party meeting in June.

The conclusions of that meeting floated several ideas to address the
bloc's low rate of effective deportations, which stubbornly hovers
around 30% with no significant change. The ideas included using trade
and visa policies as "leverage" to compel countries of origin to take
back their nationals after their asylum applications are rejected. (This
lack of cooperation has been cited as a major reason for the low return
rate.)

The June meeting also proposed the establishment of a "common European
return decision" to address another recurring problem: member states
sometimes do not recognise the return orders issued by another member state.

These specific proposals, however, are not mentioned in the new
non-paper, which mostly serves as a call-for-action on the Commission
and a display of strong political support: the 17-strong group
encompasses all regions of Europe, from Scandinavia to the
Mediterranean, and governments from the hard right to the centre left.

The joint call comes as interior ministers are set to gather in
Luxembourg on Thursday, the first meeting of its kind since Germany
re-introduced controls in all its land borders, Hungary threatened to
instrumentalise irregular migrants against Belgium, and the Netherlands
asked for an opt-out clause of the EU asylum rules.

Migration should also feature on the agenda of a two-day summit of EU
leaders next week.

The rapid succession of events has raised serious concerns about the
viability of the Schengen Area and the New Pact on Migration and Asylum,
the legislative overhaul the bloc completed in May.

The New Pact foresees provisions to close the gap between the asylum and
the return procedures, but, as the non-paper reflects, member states
want a separate piece of legislation to deal with the issue of deportations.

A proposal to reform the 2008 Return Directive has been stuck in the
European Parliament since 2019. For the 17-country group, a brand-new
text is now needed.

In the guidelines for her second term, European Commission President
Ursula von der Leyen has promised a "new common approach on returns,
with a new legislative framework to speed up and simplify the process,
ensure that returns take place in a dignified manner, digitalise case
management and ensure that return decisions are mutually recognised
across Europe."

This article has been updated to clarify that one of the signatories is
Liechtenstein, not Lithuania.
--
You voted for late term abortion. You got demographic replacement and
World War 3.

"Title 8, U.S.C. § 1324(a) defines several distinct offenses related to
aliens. Subsection 1324(a)(1)(i)-(v) prohibits alien smuggling, domestic
transportation of unauthorized aliens, concealing or harboring
unauthorized aliens, encouraging or inducing unauthorized aliens to
enter the United States, and engaging in a conspiracy or aiding and
abetting any of the preceding acts. Subsection 1324(a)(2) prohibits
bringing or attempting to bring unauthorized aliens to the United States
in any manner whatsoever, even at a designated port of entry. Subsection
1324(a)(3)."

“Western values mean three things: migration, LGBTQ, and war." Viktor Orban

https://www.globalgulag.us
D
2024-10-13 20:18:58 UTC
Permalink
If the immigrants are on EU soil, it is already too late. Asylum should
only be allowed in the applicants home city, or the geographically closest
located embassy.

Only after an accepted application should the person then be allowed to
move into EU territory. This must of course also be coupled with DNA
prints.

However, in a generation or two, several EU countries will be majority
immigrants, so I think it is too late.

Most likely though, some countries will break away from the EU within the
next 20-30 years due to unregulated immigration and rampant socialism, and
the remainder in the hard core EU will slowly crash, with war and conflict
as a result.

Let's see if anything will happen to prevent this, but I'm skeptical.
Post by Lucas McCain
Why do Europeans show such weakness and helplessness in the face of mass
invasion from hostile nations? Does anti-Christ George Soros run the
European Parliament and have puppets in every capitol? Why not fly these
failed "asylum seekers" over their countries of origin and force them out of
the planes with parachutes until they are all gone from Europe?
https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2024/10/07/17-european-countries-call-for-a-paradigm-shift-to-deport-rejected-asylum-seekers
The European Union has struggled to improve the deportation rate of asylum
seekers whose applications have been turned down.
A group of 17 European countries has called for a "paradigm shift" in
migration policy to ensure asylum seekers whose applications have been
declined are effectively and speedily sent back to their home countries.
This new approach, they say, should entail "consequences" for those who are
handed a return order but never leave the continent.
"People without the right to stay must be held accountable. A new legal basis
must clearly define their obligations and duties," the countries write in a
non-paper seen by Euronews. "Non-cooperation must have consequences and be
sanctioned."
Governments, they continue, "must be empowered" to carry out deportations "in
full respect of fundamental rights".
The document was led by Austria and the Netherlands and endorsed by Croatia,
the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Italy,
Luxembourg, Malta, Slovakia and Sweden. Norway, Switzerland and
Liechtenstein, three non-EU member states part of the Schengen Area, also
lent their signatures.
The group asks the European Commission to treat the matter "expeditiously"
and put forward a "state-of-the-art framework that responds to real
challenges and developments," building upon the discussions of a working
party meeting in June.
The conclusions of that meeting floated several ideas to address the bloc's
low rate of effective deportations, which stubbornly hovers around 30% with
no significant change. The ideas included using trade and visa policies as
"leverage" to compel countries of origin to take back their nationals after
their asylum applications are rejected. (This lack of cooperation has been
cited as a major reason for the low return rate.)
The June meeting also proposed the establishment of a "common European return
decision" to address another recurring problem: member states sometimes do
not recognise the return orders issued by another member state.
These specific proposals, however, are not mentioned in the new non-paper,
which mostly serves as a call-for-action on the Commission and a display of
strong political support: the 17-strong group encompasses all regions of
Europe, from Scandinavia to the Mediterranean, and governments from the hard
right to the centre left.
The joint call comes as interior ministers are set to gather in Luxembourg on
Thursday, the first meeting of its kind since Germany re-introduced controls
in all its land borders, Hungary threatened to instrumentalise irregular
migrants against Belgium, and the Netherlands asked for an opt-out clause of
the EU asylum rules.
Migration should also feature on the agenda of a two-day summit of EU leaders
next week.
The rapid succession of events has raised serious concerns about the
viability of the Schengen Area and the New Pact on Migration and Asylum, the
legislative overhaul the bloc completed in May.
The New Pact foresees provisions to close the gap between the asylum and the
return procedures, but, as the non-paper reflects, member states want a
separate piece of legislation to deal with the issue of deportations.
A proposal to reform the 2008 Return Directive has been stuck in the European
Parliament since 2019. For the 17-country group, a brand-new text is now
needed.
In the guidelines for her second term, European Commission President Ursula
von der Leyen has promised a "new common approach on returns, with a new
legislative framework to speed up and simplify the process, ensure that
returns take place in a dignified manner, digitalise case management and
ensure that return decisions are mutually recognised across Europe."
This article has been updated to clarify that one of the signatories is
Liechtenstein, not Lithuania.
Lucas McCain
2024-10-13 23:02:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by D
Post by Lucas McCain
Why do Europeans show such weakness and helplessness in the face of
mass invasion from hostile nations?  Does anti-Christ George Soros run
the European Parliament and have puppets in every capitol?  Why not
fly these failed "asylum seekers" over their countries of origin and
force them out of the planes with parachutes until they are all gone
from Europe?
https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2024/10/07/17-european-countries-
call-for-a-paradigm-shift-to-deport-rejected-asylum-seekers
The European Union has struggled to improve the deportation rate of
asylum seekers whose applications have been turned down.
A group of 17 European countries has called for a "paradigm shift" in
migration policy to ensure asylum seekers whose applications have been
declined are effectively and speedily sent back to their home countries.
This new approach, they say, should entail "consequences" for those
who are handed a return order but never leave the continent.
"People without the right to stay must be held accountable. A new
legal basis must clearly define their obligations and duties," the
countries write in a non-paper seen by Euronews. "Non-cooperation must
have consequences and be sanctioned."
Governments, they continue, "must be empowered" to carry out
deportations "in full respect of fundamental rights".
The document was led by Austria and the Netherlands and endorsed by
Croatia, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany,
Greece, Italy, Luxembourg, Malta, Slovakia and Sweden. Norway,
Switzerland and Liechtenstein, three non-EU member states part of the
Schengen Area, also lent their signatures.
The group asks the European Commission to treat the matter
"expeditiously" and put forward a "state-of-the-art framework that
responds to real challenges and developments," building upon the
discussions of a working party meeting in June.
The conclusions of that meeting floated several ideas to address the
bloc's low rate of effective deportations, which stubbornly hovers
around 30% with no significant change. The ideas included using trade
and visa policies as "leverage" to compel countries of origin to take
back their nationals after their asylum applications are rejected.
(This lack of cooperation has been cited as a major reason for the low
return rate.)
The June meeting also proposed the establishment of a "common European
return decision" to address another recurring problem: member states
sometimes do not recognise the return orders issued by another member state.
These specific proposals, however, are not mentioned in the new non-
paper, which mostly serves as a call-for-action on the Commission and
a display of strong political support: the 17-strong group encompasses
all regions of Europe, from Scandinavia to the Mediterranean, and
governments from the hard right to the centre left.
The joint call comes as interior ministers are set to gather in
Luxembourg on Thursday, the first meeting of its kind since Germany
re-introduced controls in all its land borders, Hungary threatened to
instrumentalise irregular migrants against Belgium, and the
Netherlands asked for an opt-out clause of the EU asylum rules.
Migration should also feature on the agenda of a two-day summit of EU
leaders next week.
The rapid succession of events has raised serious concerns about the
viability of the Schengen Area and the New Pact on Migration and
Asylum, the legislative overhaul the bloc completed in May.
The New Pact foresees provisions to close the gap between the asylum
and the return procedures, but, as the non-paper reflects, member
states want a separate piece of legislation to deal with the issue of
deportations.
A proposal to reform the 2008 Return Directive has been stuck in the
European Parliament since 2019. For the 17-country group, a brand-new
text is now needed.
In the guidelines for her second term, European Commission President
Ursula von der Leyen has promised a "new common approach on returns,
with a new legislative framework to speed up and simplify the process,
ensure that returns take place in a dignified manner, digitalise case
management and ensure that return decisions are mutually recognised
across Europe."
This article has been updated to clarify that one of the signatories
is Liechtenstein, not Lithuania.
If the immigrants are on EU soil, it is already too late. Asylum should
only be allowed in the applicants home city, or the geographically
closest located embassy.
Only after an accepted application should the person then be allowed to
move into EU territory. This must of course also be coupled with DNA
prints.
However, in a generation or two, several EU countries will be majority
immigrants, so I think it is too late.
Most likely though, some countries will break away from the EU within
the next 20-30 years due to unregulated immigration and rampant
socialism, and the remainder in the hard core EU will slowly crash, with
war and conflict as a result.
Let's see if anything will happen to prevent this, but I'm skeptical.
If the current crop of childless, far-left "leaders" get their way, all
majority white countries will be vaporized in a nuclear holocaust they
will cause by constantly provoking Russia and China vis a vis
continuously crossing red lines.

Another scenario might be that some weaponized virus might be released
that specifically targets certain invaders of color, vastly reducing
their populations in their host nations and maybe even in the failed
states they fled from. The Book of Revelation predicts a quarter of
"humanity" will be killed off when one of the Seven Seals is broken.
Will be interesting to see which quarter of "humanity" is killed off.
--
You voted for late term abortion. You got demographic replacement and
World War 3.

"Title 8, U.S.C. § 1324(a) defines several distinct offenses related to
aliens. Subsection 1324(a)(1)(i)-(v) prohibits alien smuggling, domestic
transportation of unauthorized aliens, concealing or harboring
unauthorized aliens, encouraging or inducing unauthorized aliens to
enter the United States, and engaging in a conspiracy or aiding and
abetting any of the preceding acts. Subsection 1324(a)(2) prohibits
bringing or attempting to bring unauthorized aliens to the United States
in any manner whatsoever, even at a designated port of entry. Subsection
1324(a)(3)."

“Western values mean three things: migration, LGBTQ, and war." Viktor Orban

https://www.globalgulag.us
Loading...